What I Found When I Ran SilentCosts on My Own Bank Statement

What I Found When I Ran SilentCosts on My Own Bank Statement


I’ve spent the last several months building a product designed to surface hidden costs in small businesses.

The pitch is simple: upload your data, and SilentCosts analyses it and tells you where money is quietly leaving — patterns you wouldn’t catch from a quick scroll through your bank app, but that compound into something meaningful over a year.

At some point it occurred to me that I hadn’t actually run it on myself.

So I did. I pulled my April 2026 statement, fed it through, and read the report like a client would — cold, without knowing what was coming.

Here’s what it found.


💳 Finding 1: My Amex Wasn’t Being Paid the Way I Thought

The report flagged four separate payments to American Express in a single month — totalling £964.66. Not one direct debit. Four manual transfers, spread across the month: £391 on the 2nd, £255 on the 7th, £97 on the 13th, £219 on the 23rd.

The finding wasn’t that I was overspending on the card. It was that the payment pattern suggested I wasn’t clearing the balance in full automatically — which means interest could be accruing at 29–39% APR without it being obvious from the account I was looking at.

The Amex spend itself was invisible from this statement. The fragmented repayments made the true monthly cost impossible to read at a glance.

That’s exactly the kind of thing SilentCosts is supposed to catch — not fraud, not a dramatic discovery, just a structural blind spot that quietly costs money if left unchecked.

The recommended action was straightforward: log into the Amex account, confirm whether a full balance direct debit is set up, and if not, set one. Consolidate into a single monthly payment so the true spend is visible.

I hadn’t done that. It took about four minutes to fix.


📺 Finding 2: Three Streaming Subscriptions Running Simultaneously

This one I almost dismissed — it’s not a business cost, it’s personal. But I kept it in because it illustrates the pattern perfectly.

Amazon Prime at £8.99. Netflix at £12.14. YouTube Premium at £8.99. All three active. All three on the same statement. Combined: £30.12 a month, £361 a year.

The report flagged the overlap immediately: Prime Video and Netflix together already cover virtually everything. YouTube Premium — the one that duplicates the most content — was the obvious one to cut.

£8.99 a month. £107 a year. Cancelled in two minutes.

The reason it matters beyond the saving itself: I knew I had all three. I just never looked at them together in the same sentence. That’s what the report does — it puts things next to each other that you’ve only ever seen in isolation.


❓ Finding 3: EXCELPAR — Three Charges I Couldn’t Immediately Explain

This was the most interesting finding because it was the least obvious.

Three charges from a merchant called EXCELPAR in the last week of April: £12.65 on the 24th, £12.65 on the 29th, £7.10 on the 30th. Total: £32.40 in five days.

The report flagged it as low confidence — it couldn’t definitively identify the merchant — but noted that EXCELPAR is consistent with Excel Parking, a UK parking operator. Two identical charges five days apart, followed by a smaller one, is consistent with either paid parking sessions or Parking Charge Notices.

Annualised, if that pattern held: £384.

I had to go and check. It took a few minutes of cross-referencing emails and receipts to confirm what those charges were. The point isn’t the specific amount — it’s that I had three charges from an unidentified merchant in a five-day window and hadn’t noticed. The report noticed.


🧠 What I Actually Learned

If you want the DIY version first, here’s how to audit your own costs without an accountant.

The report identified £272/month in potential recoverable spend. Annualised: £3,264.

Some of that is immediate and actionable. Some of it requires a behaviour change. Some of it I’ll probably ignore — and the report was honest enough to flag confidence levels so I could judge for myself.

But the bigger lesson wasn’t about the specific findings.

It was about what happens when you look at your own statement as if you were an outsider. Without assumption. Without the mental shorthand of “I know roughly what I spend.” Just the data, categorised, pattern- matched, and presented back to you clearly.

Most of us don’t do that. We check the balance. We scan for anything obviously wrong. We move on.

The costs that compound aren’t the ones that look wrong.
They’re the ones that look completely normal — until someone points out that normal has been quietly expensive for twelve months.

That’s what I built SilentCosts to do. Running it on myself was a good reminder of why.

New to the concept? Start here: Hidden Costs in a Small Business — what they are and where they come from.


Try SilentCosts on your own statement →